Показаны сообщения с ярлыком Lawyer. Показать все сообщения
Показаны сообщения с ярлыком Lawyer. Показать все сообщения

понедельник, 22 января 2018 г.

Worrying About the Dye Used in My MRIs

Worrying About the Dye Used in My MRIs
Worrying About the Dye Used in My MRIs

MS_Wire_Ed_Tobias

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a safety alert about gadolinium, the dye that’s injected when our doctors order a brain MRI “with and without” contrast. The dye provides the contrast that “lights up” areas of MS inflammation in the brain.


But the FDA advisory is sort of half-baked, leaving me to worry about whether I should be worried. It says that a small amount of that dye may remain “in patients’ bodies, including the brain, for months to years after receiving these drugs” during an MRI. The advisory goes on to say that gadolinium retention hasn’t been directly linked to adverse health effects “in patients with normal kidney function,” and says the FDA believes that the benefit of using the dye outweighs the risk. But I’m still a little concerned.


Here’s why I’m concerned


Though the FDA issued notices about gadolinium in the past, this one actually orders companies that make gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) to conduct new safety tests on animals and humans. That concerns me.


The FDA says the only known health problems “related to gadolinium retention have involved patients with pre-existing kidney failure.” But then FDA advisory goes on to say:


“FDA received reports of adverse events involving multiple organ systems in patients with normal kidney function. A causal association between these adverse events and gadolinium retention could not be established.”


So, if I understand this correctly, the FDA received reports of problems in patients with normal kidney function but it hasn’t been able to directly link those problems to the dye that went into their brains. Did the FDA happen to leave out the qualifying word “yet” from the advisory? That concerns me.


My most recent “with and without” MRI was done in December, not long after this latest FDA advisory was issued. Before the test, I asked the technician what she thought about the new advisory. She hadn’t heard about it. That concerns me.


I’ve been having one or two contrast MRIs each year since gadolinium was introduced around 1988. That’s somewhere between 30 and 60 scans, over nearly three decades, during which I was injected with gadolinium. It seems like a lot of dye and that concerns me.


My neurologist is aware of the FDA advisory and of the research over the past decade that indicated that the brain might retain some of the injected gadolinium. Because the amount is very small, and because the people affected by it appear to be limited to those who already have severe kidney disease, she tells me she’s not concerned.


I trust my neuro. If she’s not concerned, I’m not as concerned. But I’ll be keeping a close watch on any other news that comes out about the contrast chemical that’s used for our MRIs.


You’re invited to view my personal blog at www.themswire.com.


Note: Multiple Sclerosis News Today is strictly a news and information website about the disease. It does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. This content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this website. The opinions expressed in this column are not those of Multiple Sclerosis News Today or its parent company, BioNews Services, and are intended to spark discussion about issues pertaining to multiple sclerosis.


Print This Page



Original article and pictures take multiplesclerosisnewstoday.com site

понедельник, 25 декабря 2017 г.

Woman who faked being a lawyer for nearly a decade was in line to be named partner when her fraud was discovered

Woman who faked being a lawyer for nearly a decade was in line to be named partner when her fraud was discovered

A woman used forged documents to pretend to be a lawyer for a decade and was in line to be named partner of a firm when her fraud was discovered late last year, according to charges filed by the state attorney general's office.


Kimberly Kitchen, 45, of James Creek, Pennsylvania, was charged on Thursday with forgery and unauthorized practice of law.


State prosecutors contend Kitchen fooled BMZ Law in Huntingdon by forging a law license, bar exam results, an email showing she attended Duquesne University law school and a check for a state attorney registration fee.


Kimberly Kitchen, 45, allegedly fooled BMZ Law (pictured) in Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, by forging a law license, bar exam results, an email showing she attended Duquesne University law school and a check for a state attorney registration fee
Kimberly Kitchen, 45, allegedly fooled BMZ Law (pictured) in Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, by forging a law license, bar exam results, an email showing she attended Duquesne University law school and a check for a state attorney registration fee

Kitchen handled estate planning for more than 30 clients 'despite never having attended law school, nor being admitted to the bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,' the attorney general said in a statement.


Kitchen was, however, the past president of the Huntingdon County Bar Association, said her attorney, Caroline Roberto.


'She's an incredibly competent person and she worked very diligently and was devoted to the people she served in the community,' Roberto said.


'There are things about the charges we don't agree with so we're going to be fighting some of the charges,' Roberto said, though she wouldn't be specific.


But Christopher Wencker, the current president of the county bar association, said he doesn't think the charges are severe enough.


'For a decade of that kind of behavior, those kind of charges are insufficient and don't represent the depth or level of betrayal that was shown,' Wencker said.


The forgery charge is a first-degree misdemeanor punishable by up to five years in prison; the unauthorized practice charge is a third-degree misdemeanor, carrying up to a year in jail.


Kitchen was charged on Thursday with forgery and unauthorized practice of law after pretending to be a lawyer for a decade (file photo)
Kitchen was charged on Thursday with forgery and unauthorized practice of law after pretending to be a lawyer for a decade (file photo)

Wencker said the county bar plans to meet Tuesday to formulate a statement on behalf of the group.


A representative of the law firm didn't immediately return a call seeing comment Friday. But in December, when the Huntingdon Daily News first reported on the case, the firm issued a statement saying they would be going through all her cases.


'Sadly, it would appear that our firm was the last, in a long line of professionals, to have been deceived by Ms. Kitchen into believing she was licensed to practice law,' the statement said. 'We are undertaking a thorough review of each and every file she may have handled.'


It wasn't immediately clear where else Kitchen might have worked.


Roberto wouldn't comment on whether any clients were harmed or complained about the services Kitchen rendered, except to repeat that Kitchen was 'incredibly competent'.


She said Kitchen, who is married with no children, is no longer working anywhere.


'Since December, when she was asked not to practice again, she's just been waiting for this to be resolved,' Roberto said.


Original article and pictures take www.dailymail.co.uk site

четверг, 23 ноября 2017 г.

Why I Switched to Convertkit from ActiveCampaign

Why I Switched to Convertkit from ActiveCampaign
Why I Switched to Convertkit

Over the years I have discovered that the KISS method of marketing has always allowed me to make more money than anything which has been extremely complicated. This website is a great example of that. When I first started it, I had a grandiose plan which encompassed way to many things. Eventually I learned that all I was doing was making things so complicated that there was no way it would be profitable.


Now, by using the KISS Method (Keep it Simple Stupid), I have found that not only is my business easier to run, but it is far more efficient than it has ever been.


In fact, at once point I was going to abandon this website and the ideas behind it, but now I am moving forward with it. I have a clear and simple vision for it which will not only help me, but also help those who visit and join.


By now you are asking yourself: What does this have to do with switching from Convertkit from Active Campaign? It has everything to do with it. Here's why.


From Complex to Simple


First and foremost I have to say I love ActiveCampaign and I still have an account with them. The problem is, the feature set which allowed me to create complex email automations based on user behavior was great, but the processes which allowed me to create email content were not.


I found it was taking me tons of time to create a single email and when I wanted to create an email sequence of any kind, it took forever. It just wasn't what I liked or wanted, so I began to search around for something which had a lot of the same power that ActiveCampaign has, but without the complexity.


Fast forward to July 2016. I was looking through a recommended reading list I put together back in September 2015 and was getting ready to delete it when I saw an old blog post from my favorite WordPress Theme company Thrive Themes. They had posted an article and video showing off their new integration for Convertkit with Thrive Leads. I clicked on the link and ultimately decided to take a look at this new service I had heard a little about, yet didn't really know anything about.


After watching several videos I was taken in by their main marketing message. Email Marketing for Professional Bloggers. But not only that, I was taken in by the "why" in their message. They said they wanted to create something "simple" yet elegant and powerful.


Simple.


With this in mind I decided it was time to take a deeper look. I wanted to see if their version of simple and powerful met my needs and more importantly; allowed me to improve my productivity and streamline my business systems and processes.


Here is what I found.


Subscribers and Integrations


​ActiveCampaign integrates with everything. Their API is fantastic and I never had a single issue with getting new subscribers. In fact, using an Exit Pop on my viral sites via Thrive Leads and AC I average over 50 new leads per day per site.


How does Convertkit do after testing? The integration has worked seamlessly for me. In fact, not only does ConvertKit work with Thrive Leads just like AC does. It integrates with WordPress and quite a few of my other favorite tools as well.


Here are a few of their current integrations:


Convertkit Integrations

​Being able to add new Subscribers via multiple different tools and services is an important feature for me. That being said, one of the things which really pulled me into Convertkit was the fact you can have Subscribers added multiple ways (Forms, Sequences, Tags, Purchases, Link Clicks, etc.).


More importantly though, these Subscribers are only added to your account once. So many services charge you for how many people are on each list you have, but in Convertkit there are no lists. You simply segment your Subscribers based on criteria you set.


Thrive Leads Shortcode could not be rendered, please check it in Thrive Leads Section!


Segmentation and Automation Rules


What does this mean?


It means that when you add a new Subscriber after they download a free ebook from you, the same Subscriber can make a purchase later and still only be added to your account once. Then when you want to send out an email sequence or broadcast, you simply select the Trigger or Segment for whom should receive your email.


Convertkit Automation Rules

The amount of Automation Rules for sending emails is incredible and with this you can also simply create segments of Subscribers for sending email sequences or single newsletter type broadcasts​.


Convertkit Segmentation

You can create even more complex segments in ActiveCampaign, but remember my reason for looking at Convertkit was simplicity. I wanted to simplify my systems and processes and once you see how this all works together seamlessly inside Convertkit you will agree it is very simple and easy to use.


Emails and Email Seqences


As I said in the beginning though, my main frustration with ActiveCampaign has been how long it takes me to create and write an email. If you haven't done this in AC, then you don't know how truly cumbersome it is. AC uses a modular system to build out Newsletters and it isn't easy to simply create a text type email at all.


What's even worse is that while AC thrives on being able to create complex automations for different actions based on user behavior, it can be quite timely to create an email sequence of any kind. It took me an hour and a half to put together a 4-email follow-up sequence for my grilling recipes site.


I was able to do the same type of email sequence in Convertkit in half the time. But even more so than being an efficient setup and system in Converkit, it is laid out so you can ensure all your emails flow together and make sense. They are all laid out in front of you in a very intuitive manner. Subjects and timelines are shown on the left and the actual email is on the right. The email Preview functions are fantastic as well. It is nice being able to see how things will look before you hit the send button.


Take a look: (*Courses are now called Sequences)


Convertkit Sequences

Single email blasts are just as easy and you can either create a new segment to send to or send to people you've Tagged, subscribed through a specific Form on your site, Purchased a product from you, downloaded an ebook, or a combination of all or none of these. The bonus is everything is simple and easy to use. I can send an email quickly and get instant feedback and reporting from Convertkit's awesome reporting features.


Conclusion


I'm sure you can tell by now that I am very happy with Convertkit. It might not have all the bells and whistles of ActiveCampaign, but for what it lacks in complexity, it makes up for in being highly efficient. Any tool which allows me to conduct my email marketing faster and better is a tool I need to use and promote to my followers.


So, if you are not happy with what you are using or if you are in the market for a simple, yet powerful email marketing service, I highly recommend Convertkit.​


Original article and pictures take getstarted.net site

пятница, 20 октября 2017 г.

White House Staff Could Be in Trouble if They Help Trump With Fake News Awards, Says Former WH Lawyer

White House Staff Could Be in Trouble if They Help Trump With Fake News Awards, Says Former WH Lawyer

On Sunday, a former White House ethics lawyer warned West Wing staff that if they help the president with "fake news" awards he has promised to hand out, they could be breaking the law.


President Donald Trump said he still plans to go ahead with "fake news" awards he first suggested in November and promised on Twitter to hand out Monday. However, he tweeted late Sunday that he would push back the announcement of winners to January 17.


“WARNING to White House staff: the president may be exempt from the rules at 5 CFR § 2635.701 et seq. on misuse of position BUT YOU ARE NOT,” tweeted Norm Eisen, who served as White House Special Counsel for Ethics in the Obama administration.


In his message, Eisen told White House staff that if they help the president deliver the awards they could risk violating provisions of the law that forbid the use of government time and money to harm some members of the media and help others.


Workers cut branches from the magnolia tree planted by President Andrew Jackson after it was determined the tree had become weak due to age and decay at the White House in Washington, December 27, 2017. Joshua Roberts/Reuters


Eisen is chair of the board of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a watchdog group that has attempted to bring a series of lawsuits against the Trump administration for ethics violations over the past year.


"If any [White House] staffers work on this or post it on the WH website, it will be a violation of the Standards of Conduct,” wrote Walter Shaub, the former director of the Office of Government Ethics, in a supporting tweet directed at the Trump administration’s press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders on Sunday.


“Beware of laws on using federal appropriations too, if there are any visuals, certificates, handouts, or trophies,” Shaub added.


Last month, White House director of social media Dan Scavino Jr.‏ said he has “nothing to do with” the awards, which he noted are being run by Trump’s 2020 campaign.


“The Fake News Awards, those going to the most corrupt & biased of the Mainstream Media, will be presented to the losers on Wednesday, January 17th, rather than this coming Monday,” Trump tweeted Sunday. “The interest in, and importance of, these awards is far greater than anyone could have anticipated!”


Details have not been released about how Trump will deliver the awards or whether any members of the White House are involved in coordinating or assisting the president with the project.


The Republican National Committee has been promoting an online poll for the awards after Trump tweeted about the idea of creating a trophy for “the most dishonest, corrupt and/or distorted in its political coverage of your favorite President (me)” in late November.


At the time, Trump said the awards would exclude the Fox News network.


The online poll run by the GOP features stories from ABC News, CNN and Time magazine—each of which has been corrected.


Those who respond to the poll are asked to rank each of the three media stories as “fake,” “faker” or “fakest” news.


Days after Trump’s tweet suggesting the awards, the conservative pollsters Rasmussen found that 40 percent of Americans thought the top award should go to Fox News. CNN came in second with 25 percent of respondents and MSNBC with 9 percent.


More from Newsweek


Original article and pictures take s.yimg.com site

вторник, 26 сентября 2017 г.

White House lawyer faces calls to resign after he 'tried to stop Jeff Sessions recusing himself from Russia probe'

White House lawyer faces calls to resign after he 'tried to stop Jeff Sessions recusing himself from Russia probe'
Mr McGahn is pictured here leaving the White House during the presidential transition period in 2016

A top House Democrat is calling for the dismissal of the White House counsel Don McGahn over his role in the probe into Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election.


Representative Jerrold Nadler called for the dismissal after a report from the New York Times indicated that President Donald Trump ordered Mr McGahn to stop Attorney General Jeff Sessions from recusing himself from the investigation into the meddling.


Mr Nadler, in a statement, said that the order — and Mr McGahn’s decision to follow the directive — amounts to an effort to undermine the Justice Department and its investigation. Mr McGahn’s role as a government employee, Mr Nadler said, does not allow him to act like Mr Trump’s former personal attorney, Roy Cohn.


Read more

“Mr. McGahn’s actions under Mr. Trump’s orders in either case would appear to be yet another incident pointing to an overall effort to obstruct and undermine the Department of Justice,” Mr Nadler said. “It is not the duty of the White House Counsel to be the President’s Roy Cohn, as Donald Trump would have it, but to protect and defend the Constitution — which Mr. McGahn seems to be failing to do.”


The New York Times report indicates that Mr Trump instructed his White House counsel to put pressure on Mr Sessions in March, and that Mr McGahn then lobbied the embattled attorney general to stay involved. When Mr McGahn was unsuccessful, Mr Trump reportedly erupted in anger in front of several White House officials, and said he needed his attorney general to protect him.


The episode is one of several previously unreported instances that special counsel Robert Mueller is said to have learned about in the course of his 2016 probe.


Other instances include Mr Trump penning a letter that he intended to deliver to former FBI Director James Comey, who was in charge of the Russia investigation at the time, saying that the investigation was “fabricated and politically motivated”. White House aides intervened, and stopped the letter from being sent.


Another revelation has been that former White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus penned handwritten notes that the President had called Mr Comey to urge him to publicly announce that he wasn’t personally a target in the investigation. The special counsel has reportedly received those notes.


And, in the lead up to Mr Comey’s firing last year — which ultimately resulted in the appointment of Mr Mueller — Mr Trump’s aides reportedly misled him about his ability to fire his FBI director, and one of Mr Sessions’ aides went to congressional staff to ask if they had any damaging information on Mr Comey as they sought to undermine the former FBI director.


Reuse content


Original article and pictures take www.independent.co.uk site

среда, 20 сентября 2017 г.

Whatever Stereotypes You Have About Lawyers, I Hope We Can All Agree On One Thing

Whatever Stereotypes You Have About Lawyers, I Hope We Can All Agree On One Thing

Some of the pie charts and bar graphs made me happy. Some of them made me go "errr... ." But hey! At the end, we get some really important two cents on what we can do next. And I hope we can all say we need more women. Err, in law.


FACT CHECK TIME! One of the legal career statistics near the top of the infographic seems to imply that more than 45% of women earned law degrees in the last 12 years. This is misworded; the correct statistic is that more than 45% of all law degrees earned in the last 12 years were by women, according to the cited source.


Original article and pictures take www.upworthy.com site

вторник, 15 августа 2017 г.

What Law School Did NOT Teach You – Infographic

What Law School Did NOT Teach You – Infographic

If you are a law student, I’m sure your school has thought you a lot of the majorly important things you will need in order to become a successful lawyer. However, it probably has not taught you enough. There are plenty of side skills a lawyer needs to have in order to run a smooth and effective business. Here is what your law school failed to teach you:


What Law School Did NOT Teach You - Infographic

Infographic by – My Case


Original article and pictures take graphicspedia.net site

среда, 2 августа 2017 г.

Utah Attorney Specialties

Utah Attorney Specialties

Call Us: 801-990-6390


I was lucky to have Stacey work on my case. She was professional and I was very pleased with the great divorce settlement she negotiated for me.


Our professionals serve the entire state of Utah! Located in the heart of Salt Lake County, our growing firm is backed by an experienced team who’ve represented the Greater Salt Lake Area for over 25 years in areas such as: Utah DUI, criminal defense, paternity law, family law, divorce law, adoption, custody, and child support disputes.


Salt Lake County


Divorce Attorneys & More!


With over 25 years of experience in the Greater Salt Lake Area, we have professional attorneys ready to assist you in the areas of Criminal Defense, DUI, Divorce, Child Support, Adoption, Family Law, and more!


How We Work


Providing aggressive legal representation and fighting for your rights.


Integrity is what we value at Schmidt Law. You can be confident the legal counsel received will allow you to exercise your rights, empower you with options, and provide you with the tools necessary to make an informed decision.


What to Expect


  • Passion for Equity
  • Desire to Succeed
  • Vision to Accomplish
  • Determination to Win

Adoptions can be a complicated process. We can explain and make all the arrangements needed during the adoption process. Give us a call and schedule your free consultation today!


Experiencing issues with child support? We have a seasoned team in child support enforcement & child support adjustment requirements and can help you.


In need of criminal defense? Our seasoned team ensure your rights are protected & aggressively defended against criminal charges. We are efficient and effective.


Unexpected DUI’s can have harsh punishments. Whether it’s alcohol or another substance, our Salt Lake County DUI attorney can help.


Child Custody disputes can be a very stressful time. Our seasoned team can represent you effectively and will always have your and your child’s best interest in mind.


Need advice on a legal separation or divorce in Utah? Our team is efficient and effective. We have helped hundreds successfully navigate the divorce process.


As a seasoned team, we are known for how aggressively and effectively we fight for you. Call our Salt Lake County attorney office today.


We can represent non-custodial parents granted visitation rights by the court. Contact the Schmidt law firm for your free consultation.


Need an Attorney?


Call us immediately to schedule an appointment and receive your Free Consultation.


GET A FREE CONSULTATION


Original article and pictures take staceyschmidtlawfirm.com site

четверг, 13 июля 2017 г.

Understanding the Job and Qualities of Divorce Lawyer Singapore

Understanding the Job and Qualities of Divorce Lawyer Singapore

Understanding the Job and Qualities of Divorce Lawyer Singapore



Who is a Singapore divorce lawyer? Well he or she will be a legal specialist who will be representing the clients in the court who have decided to take the call to go for a marriage dissolve process.


Who is a Singapore divorce lawyer? Well he or she will be a legal specialist who will be representing the clients in the court who have decided to take the call to go for a marriage dissolve process. Each divorce case is not same and depending on the complexity of individual case what will be the role of the lawyer can be determined. It will also determine the volume of work he or she need to do for the case to get justice and required alimony for the client.


Let’s take a note of the work which a lawyer needs to do get divorce in Singapore done


  • Making calculation for the division of assets
  • Making calculation for the spousal and child support maintenance
  • Represent the client in each and every court hearing
  • Represent the clients in Collaborative Family Practice process
  • Offer mediation to clients in order to make an effort to settle the case in a positive note by saving the marriage

What are the Qualities of a Good Divorce Lawyers


  • Need to have an excellent communication skill and ready to listen to the needs of the clients
  • Guide clients towards deciding the steps to get prepare before appearing in the court
  • Giving an Explanation to the law which is related to the respective case of the client
  • Shows clients alternative ways of dispute resolution for saving both time as well as money of the client
  • Will not mind to share with you the actual truth of the case even in the case its worst for you
  • Will give you a realistic assessment about the chances of getting the desired result in favour of the client
  • Need to have an excellent track record for resolving some of the most complex and high conflict marriage disputes.
  • Need to be one who can help the client in getting the child custody
  • Ready to give personal attention towards the clients for saving the marriage if possible

Searching online will give you the scope to know about the agencies which are having the best divorce lawyers with them. In case you have any questions in your mind then we will recommend you to get that cleared in the very first meeting to avoid any dispute at the time of case proceedings. Check the reviews and experience of the lawyers in the industry before you confirm his or her appointment as your lawyer for Divorce.


About Author: Jamson Lim works for a top international law firm in Singapore and has effectively handled foreigners divorce cases in Singapore. He mostly writes on topics likes expat divorce ebligibility, divorce in Singapore, expat assets division and others.


Original article and pictures take cdn-images-1.medium.com site

среда, 21 июня 2017 г.

Turns Out Roy Moore’s Jewish Lawyer Is Actually A Christian Now

Turns Out Roy Moore’s Jewish Lawyer Is Actually A Christian Now

The Jewish lawyer Roy Moore’s wife invoked when responding to anti-Semitism claims on the eve of Alabama’s special election is now an evangelical Christian.


In an email to AL.com, Kayla Moore said she was referring that night to Martin Wishnatsky, a lawyer who works for the Foundation of Moral Law, which was founded by the former judge in 2003. Wishnatsky gave an interview to AL.com in which he discussed his faith in detail.


He was born and raised Jewish, he said, but became a Christian in his 30s. He says he is a Messianic Jew, a term he says is used for a Jewish person who has accepted Christ.


According to AL.com, Wishnatsky became a Mormon first, then an evangelical Protestant Christian. He is staunchly against abortion rights and has spent a total of 18 months behind bars for protests against women’s access to health care, including blocking clinic entrances.


Kayla Moore’s comments came under fire as she was introducing her husband at the final campaign event before the special election for Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ former Senate seat. She lashed out at the media, calling reports on Moore’s history of sexual misconduct and harassment “fake news.” She also responded to the backlash her husband received after suggesting Democratic donor George Soros would go to hell for his Jewish faith.


“Fake news would tell you that we don’t care for Jews,” Kayla Moore said. “I tell you all this because I’ve seen it also; I just want to set the record straight .... One of our attorneys is a Jew. We have very close friends who are Jewish and rabbis, and we also fellowship with them.”


Original article and pictures take s.m.huffpost.com site

понедельник, 22 мая 2017 г.

trust me im a lawyer coffee mug

trust me im a lawyer coffee mug
trust me im a lawyer coffee mug - Shirtoopia

Dear Mom Mug
Dear Mom Mug

World`s Greatest Farter I Mean Father Mug
World`s Greatest Farter I Mean Father Mug

Teenage Daughter Survivor Mug for Mothers - Shirtoopia
Teenage Daughter Survivor Mug for Mothers

Original article and pictures take cdn.shopify.com site

пятница, 21 апреля 2017 г.

Trump's lawyer reportedly paid a porn star $130,000 just before the election to keep her quiet about an alleged sexual encounter with Trump

Trump's lawyer reportedly paid a porn star $130,000 just before the election to keep her quiet about an alleged sexual encounter with Trump

Unable to play video. Neither flash nor html5 is supported!


  • President Donald Trump's top lawyer, Michael Cohen, reportedly paid $130,000 in hush money to a porn star so that she wouldn't discuss an alleged 2006 sexual encounter with Trump, The Wall Street Journal reported Friday.
  • The alleged sexual encounter happened between Trump and Stephanie Clifford, whose stage name is Stormy Daniels, at a July 2006 celebrity golf tournament in Lake Tahoe.

One of President Donald Trump's most trusted lawyers sent $130,000 in hush money to a porn star just weeks before the 2016 presidential election to keep her silent about an alleged 2006 sexual encounter she had with the then-Republican presidential nominee, The Wall Street Journal reported Friday.


The newspaper reported that Michael Cohen, who served as the Trump Organization's top attorney for about a decade, arranged for the payment to Stephanie Clifford, whose stage name is Stormy Daniels, in October 2016 after a negotiation between her lawyer and Cohen on a nondisclosure agreement, sources said.


The sexual encounter allegedly happened between Trump and Clifford at a July 2006 celebrity golf tournament in Lake Tahoe.


Trump married his third wife, Melania Trump, in 2005.


Though Trump faced more than a dozen allegations of sexual misconduct, dating back decades, during the campaign, The Journal reported that alleged encounter between Trump and Clifford was consensual.


"These are old, recycled reports, which were published and strongly denied prior to the election," a White House official told The Journal of the alleged encounter, though they did not answer questions about the $130,000. Cohen released a statement to The Journal as well, saying that Trump "once again vehemently denies any such occurrence as has Ms. Daniels."


See Gallery


He did not address the payment as well.


"This is now the second time that you are raising outlandish allegations against my client," Cohen added. "You have attempted to perpetuate this false narrative for over a year; a narrative that has been consistently denied by all parties since at least 2011."


Cohen, the Journal reported, sent a two-paragraph statement over email addressed "TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN," signed by "Stormy Daniels," which denied that she engaged in a "sexual and/or romantic affair" with Trump.


"Rumors that I have received hush money from Donald Trump are completely false," the statement said.


Clifford did not respond to The Journal, which added that Clifford's "camp complained the payment wasn't being made quickly enough and threatened to cancel the deal," according to people familiar with the ordeal.


The Journal also published a 2006 photo of Trump with Clifford from her Myspace account.


Another adult film star, Jessica Drake, alleged in October 2016 that Trump engaged in sexual misconduct with her at that same 2006 golf tournament. The White House called that claim "totally false and ridiculous."


SEE ALSO: Trump doubles down on the need for a 'see-through' border wall because he wants 'to be able to see'


NOW WATCH: A reporter who met with the former spy behind the Trump-Russia dossier explains why it’s not 'fake news'


Jan 20, 2017 Most Recent
Unemployment
Rate Updated: Nov 17, 2017
4.8% 4.1%
S&P 500 Updated: Dec 22, 2017 2,264 2,685
GDP Growth Updated: Nov 29, 2017 2.1% 3.3%

The No. 1 Stock to Buy Right Now UrgentLearn More
Improve Your Credit Score For Home Ownership. The Penny HoarderLearn More
Amazon debuts the store without a checkout Financial TimesLearn More

Original article and pictures take s.blogsmithmedia.com site

среда, 5 апреля 2017 г.

Trump's lawyer funneled $130,000 to ex-porn star just before 2016 election to buy her silence on claims she had sexual encounter with now president

Trump's lawyer funneled $130,000 to ex-porn star just before 2016 election to buy her silence on claims she had sexual encounter with now president

Donald Trump's lawyer reportedly paid off an ex-porn star a month prior to the election who allegedly had a sexual encounter with the billionaire a decade before he was president, a report on Friday revealed.


The Wall Street Journal says that Trump's personal attorney, Michael Cohen, arranged for Stephanie Clifford, whose stage name was Stormy Daniels, to be paid $130,000 in October of 2016 so that she would keep quiet.


According to the Journal, Trump, 71, and Clifford, 38, met at a celebrity golf tournament in July of 2006. The Lake Tahoe event is where the sexual encounter is said to have taken place.


Cohen, the White House and Clifford have all denied that a steamy affair ever took place.


Donald Trump 's lawyer reportedly paid off an ex-porn star a month prior to the election who allegedly had a sexual encounter with the billionaire a decade before he was president, a report on Friday revealed 
Donald Trump 's lawyer reportedly paid off an ex-porn star a month prior to the election who allegedly had a sexual encounter with the billionaire a decade before he was president, a report on Friday revealed

Trump's alleged tete-a-tete with Daniels is not synonymous with the sexual harassment allegations that have been dogging the president. Their encounter is said to have been consenual
Trump's alleged tete-a-tete with Daniels is not synonymous with the sexual harassment allegations that have been dogging the president. Their encounter is said to have been consenual

Adult film actress Stormy Daniels presents a creation by Junker Designs during a fashion show debuting the company's new collection at the Rainbow Bar & Grill as part of the MAGIC convention August 28, 2006 in Las Vegas, Nevada
Adult film actress Stormy Daniels presents a creation by Junker Designs during a fashion show debuting the company's new collection at the Rainbow Bar & Grill as part of the MAGIC convention August 28, 2006 in Las Vegas, Nevada

People familiar with the matter said that Michael Cohen, the longtime head of the Trump Organization's legal department, worked out a nondisclosure agreement with Clifford's attorney
People familiar with the matter said that Michael Cohen, the longtime head of the Trump Organization's legal department, worked out a nondisclosure agreement with Clifford's attorney



Clifford said in a Jan. 10 statement, which she signed with her stage name, that neither the affair nor the payoff took place.


'If I did indeed have a relationship with Donald Trump, trust me, you wouldn't be reading about it in the news,' Clifford said in the statement that Cohen provided to news outlets, 'you would be reading about it in my book.'


The future president was already married to his third wife, Melania Trump, the current first lady of the United States, at the time of the reported rendezvous. The couple wed in 2005.


People familiar with the matter told the Journal that Cohen, the longtime head of the Trump Organization's legal department, worked out a nondisclosure agreement with Clifford's attorney to keep the matter quiet last year.


Clifford said in a Jan. 10 statement, which she signed with her stage name, that neither the affair nor the payoff took place
Clifford said in a Jan. 10 statement, which she signed with her stage name, that neither the affair nor the payoff took place

Cohen did not comment on the $130,000 when asked about the payoff, the Journal says. Instead, the Trump lawyer replied, President Trump once again vehemently denies any such occurrence as has Ms. Daniels.'


'This is now the second time that you are raising outlandish allegations against my client. You have attempted to perpetuate this false narrative for over a year; a narrative that has been consistently denied by all parties since at least 2011,' he reportedly said.


The Journal had previously reported that Daniels had been in talks with Good Morning America in 2016 to make an appearance.


It also claimed the National Enquirer's parent company bought a former Playboy centerfold model's story for $150,000 three months before the election only to bury it.


The future president was already married to his third wife, Melania Trump, the current first lady of the United States, at the time of the reported rendezvous. The couple wed in 2005
The future president was already married to his third wife, Melania Trump, the current first lady of the United States, at the time of the reported rendezvous. The couple wed in 2005

The White House slapped down the Journal's latest report on Trump's alleged affair with Clifford.


'These are old, recycled reports, which were published and strongly denied prior to the election,' a spokesperson told the publication.


Clifford also said in a statement: 'Rumors that I have received hush money from Donald Trump are completely false.'


A lawyer for Clifford, Keith Davidson, confirmed that that he had previously represented the porn star.


However, he said, 'Attorney-client privilege prohibits me from commenting on my clients’ legal matters.'


Cohen no longer works for the Trump Organization. He left after close to a decade after the election. He still acts as Trump's personal attorney, however.


Trump's alleged tete-a-tete with Clifford - aka Daniels - is not synonymous with the sexual harassment allegations that have been dogging the president. Their encounter was said by the Journal to have been consensual.


The check to the former adult film star that the Journal revealed would have landed just as Trump was being lambasted in the press for his claim on a 2005 tape that because he was a star he could grab women 'by the p***y' with no recourse.


Trump's personal attorney, Michael Cohen, who is said to have arranged the payment is pictured
Trump's personal attorney, Michael Cohen, who is said to have arranged the payment is pictured

The president apologized for the comments and denied that he'd ever sexually assaulted women.


Prior to winning the presidency, Trump sat atop the Trump Organization. The real estate mogul was also the star of 'The Apprentice' and 'The Celebrity Apprentice.'


Clifford appeared in 150 porn films, the Journal reported, and had a relationship with Trump when she was 27.


The president is said to have had a sexual encounter with her at the American Century Championship in 2006 at Edgewood Tahoe golf course in Nevada.


Porn star Jessica Drake also claims that she had an encounter with Trump at the same golf event - but she says hers was not consensual. She has accused Trump of forcibly kissing her and two other women in a hotel suite.


The White House pointed the Journal to a campaign statement that called her claim 'totally false and ridiculous' for its report on Clifford.


Original article and pictures take www.dailymail.co.uk site

вторник, 28 февраля 2017 г.

Trump's lawyer emailed Kremlin about real estate project during campaign

Trump's lawyer emailed Kremlin about real estate project during campaign

Donald Trump’s lawyer emailed Vladimir Putin’s spokesman during the US presidential campaign asking for help with a Trump real estate project in Moscow, according to email evidence presented to Congress.


Michael Cohen, who was vice-president of the Trump Organization at the time as well as being Trump’s attorney, sent an email to Dmitry Peskov, a top Kremlin official, according to the Washington Post.


“Over the past few months I have been working with a company based in Russia regarding the development of a Trump Tower-Moscow project in Moscow City,” the Post reported, citing “a person familiar with the email”.


“Without getting into lengthy specifics the communication between our two sides has stalled,” Cohen said in the Peskov email, which is the most direct high-level communication between the Trump camp and the Kremlin to have emerged so far in the sprawling investigation into Trump-Moscow links.


In a dossier of allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials compiled by former British intelligence official, Christopher Steele, Peskov is cited as being in charge of a Kremlin operation to damage Hillary Clinton’s candidacy and promote Trump’s.


The Steele dossier also portrays Cohen as being a key player in the alleged collusion to skew the election, a role Cohen has repeatedly denied.


According to the Post, Cohen wrote to Peskov: “As this project is too important, I am hereby requesting your assistance,” adding: “I respectfully request someone, preferably you, contact me so that I might discuss the specifics as well as arranging meetings with the appropriate individuals. I thank you in advance for your assistance and look forward to hearing from you soon.”


The email is a vivid illustration of the blurred lines between Trump’s business and political activities. When it was sent, Trump was in full campaign mode, holding daily rallies in Iowa, New Hampshire and other states critical to the Republican primary contest.


Other emails published on Monday showed that the Trump Tower project was being promoted by a Russian-born business associate of Trump who was claiming he could persuade Vladimir Putin to back the real estate scheme and help get Trump elected president.


The new details about Trump’s links with the Kremlin, now being investigated by a special prosecutor, emerged from the leaks of emails sent by Felix Sater, who worked for the Trump Organization pursuing property deals around the world.


Sater’s emails, sent in late 2015 to Trump’s lawyer and then Trump Organization vice-president, Michael Cohen, gave an upbeat assessment of the chances of getting Putin to back the development of a Trump Tower in Moscow and the positive knock-on effect that would have on Trump’s presidential campaign.


“Our boy can become president of the USA and we can engineer it,” Sater said, according to an email published by the New York Times. “I will get all of Putin’s team to buy in on this, I will manage this process.”


In another email, Sater looked forward to the eventual ribbon-cutting on a Trump Tower in the Russian capital. “I will get Putin on this program and we will get Donald elected,” he wrote.


It is unclear, from the email excerpts published, to what extent Sater expected Putin to intervene directly to help Trump’s election campaign, but he clearly presented the Russian leader as crucial in determining the outcome of the US vote. However, the Trump Tower in Moscow never materialized. Cohen said in a statement published by the New York Times, that he had suspected Sater of overstating the prospects of success.


“He has sometimes used colorful language and has been prone to ‘salesmanship’,” Cohen said. “I ultimately determined that the proposal was not feasible and never agreed to make a trip to Russia.”


According to a statement Cohen submitted to Congress, also obtained by the Washington Post, he said he had written to Peskov on Sater’s recommendation, in an effort to get Russian government approval of the Trump Tower project. He said he did not recall receiving a response from the Kremlin spokesman and the project was abandoned two weeks later.


The Trump Organization is reported to have handed the emails to congressional committee carrying out a parallel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. It issued a statement Monday saying: “To be clear, the Trump Organization has never had any real estate holdings or interests in Russia.”


However, the Cohen email to Peskov suggest that the organization was still eagerly pursuing a Trump Tower development in Moscow months after Trump entered the presidential race.


According to Bloomberg News, Cohen said in his statement to Congress that he had discussed the Trump Tower-Moscow project with Trump himself on three occasions and that the Trump Organisation signed a non-binding letter of intent with a Russian developer in October 2015. However, Cohen said the building permits were not forthcoming from the Russian government, and that he had taken the decision to close down the project in early 2016 without referring to his boss, and for purely “business reasons”.


Sater has emerged as a central figure in the Trump-Moscow investigation. He was born Felix Sheferovsky in Moscow in 1966 and moved to the US with his family when still a child. He was imprisoned for stabbing a man in the face with the stem of a smashed margarita glass in 1991, and avoided jail for involvement in a mob-related money-laundering and stock-fraud scheme by becoming an informant for the FBI on organised crime and arms trafficking.


The assistant attorney-general who signed Sater’s plea deal in 1998, Andrew Weissman, is now working in the special prosecutor team investigating a Trump-Moscow links.


The Financial Times reported that Sater is also cooperating with an international investigation into a Kazakh money-laundering network.


Sater and Cohen are reported to have known each other since they were teenagers in New York. Sater established a business relationship with Trump when he was working for a real estate company Bayrock, which partnered with the Trump Organization to build the Trump SoHo hotel in New York, which was completed in 2010. The same year Sater was distributing business card identifying him as a “senior adviser” to Trump.


However, the Trump Organization denied it ever formally employed Sater. Questioned in late 2015, about the time Sater was sending emails about Moscow, Trump claimed not to remember him.


“Felix Sater, boy, I have to even think about it,” he told the Associated Press. “I’m not that familiar with him.”


Original article and pictures take assets.guim.co.uk site

пятница, 17 февраля 2017 г.

Trump’s Tweets About FBI Could Be Witness Intimidation, Former White House Lawyers Say

Trump’s Tweets About FBI Could Be Witness Intimidation, Former White House Lawyers Say

Updated | President Donald Trump’s recent tweets about current or former FBI officials could violate laws meant to protect witnesses, according to two former White House ethics lawyers.


In recent days, Trump has criticized former FBI Director James Comey, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and outgoing FBI general counsel James Baker. In a tweet on December 23, Trump repeated a previous claim that Comey leaked a memo to a friend to pass along to a reporter. In the same tweet, the president also resurfaced a claim that McCabe received $700,000 from “puppets” of Hillary Clinton, a reference to a state senate campaign in which McCabe’s wife received $675,288 in contributions from two entities associated with Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe, a Clinton ally.


In a follow-up tweet that day, Trump added, “FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe is racing the clock to retire with full benefits. 90 days to go?!!!” And in a third tweet, he wrote, “Wow, ‘FBI lawyer James Baker reassigned,’ according to @FoxNews.”


The next day, Trump tweeted again about McCabe and his wife, referencing a Fox News report about the deputy’s allegedly using “his FBI Official Email Account to promote her campaign. You obviously cannot do this.”


The FBI and special counsel Robert Mueller are investigating Trump’s 2016 campaign, including whether Trump obstructed justice by firing Comey in May—and it’s possible that Comey, McCabe and Baker could be witnesses in that probe. Comey has already testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee, in June, and McCabe met with the House Intelligence Committee on December 19. Both committees are overseeing their own investigations into Russia’s election meddling and possible coordination with the Trump campaign. On December 21, McCabe also met with members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the House Judiciary Committee.


“Normally, someone being investigated for obstruction of justice who intimidates and threatens three key witnesses against him (here Comey, McCabe and Baker) risks additional witness tampering charges,” tweeted Norm Eisen, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and special assistant for ethics and government reform for former President Barack Obama.


Richard Painter, a professor at the University of Minnesota Law School who served as chief ethics lawyer in the George W. Bush White House, agreed. “Using Twitter on Christmas Eve to intimidate a witness (McCabe) in a criminal investigation is not a very Christian way to celebrate the holiday,” he tweeted. “But it does make Mr. Mueller’s job easier and that’s a nice thing to do. Merry Christmas!”


Representative Ted Lieu, a Democrat from California who has been a vocal opponent of Trump, posted a similar message on Twitter: “.@POTUS has tweeted quite a bit about career FBI official Andrew McCabe, who could be called as a witness against Trump in an Obstruction of Justice case. Trump’s Twitter feed is the gift that keeps on giving. Merry Christmas Robert Mueller.”


The main federal law regarding tampering with a witness, victim or informant is 18 U.S. Code § 1512. Among other violations, the code calls for punishing “whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so” in order to “influence, delay or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding” or “cause or induce any person to withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document or other object, from an official proceeding.”



FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe arrives for a meeting with members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the House Judiciary Committee on December 21. President Donald Trump has criticized McCabe in tweets.


This is not the first time that legal and ethics analysts have questioned whether Trump could be intimidating witnesses through Twitter. After Trump tweeted in May, “James Comey better hope that there are no ‘tapes’ of our conversations before he starts leaking to the press,” Peter Zeidenberg, a former federal prosecutor, told Newsweek, “He’s trying to affect the testimony of a witness, which you’re not supposed to do.”


Trump’s tweeting about former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, whom he fired in January, might have also involved intimidation, Hannah Ryan has written for Just Security, a national security law and policy online forum. In May, Trump tweeted about Yates the day she was testifying about Russia before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism, “Ask Sally Yates, under oath, if she knows how classified information got into the newspapers soon after she explained it to W.H. Counsel.” The president has also tweeted negatively about Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, both of whom could be witnesses to an obstruction of justice probe, as Ryan wrote.


But Alex Whiting, a Harvard Law School professor and former federal prosecutor, pointed out to Ryan that to violate the witness intimidation law, Trump’s remarks must cross “the line from the ordinary kinds of attacks that investigation targets or defendants might make...over to statements designed to interfere with a witness’s testimony.” To determine whether they violate the law, Whiting said, “you would examine his statements carefully to assess to what extent they were threatening, whether they indicated that there might be consequences to testifying, whether they indicated pressure to withhold or fabricate testimony.”


It’s unlikely that senior law enforcement officials such as Comey and McCabe are easily intimidated. “Comey is the former head of the FBI and spent his career in law enforcement,” Renato Mariotti, another former federal prosecutor, told Just Security prior to Trump’s more recent comments. “In my nine years in law enforcement I faced much tougher threats than that tweet.”


The White House could not immediately be reached for comment.


This article has been updated to include a tweet by Representative Ted Lieu.


Original article and pictures take s.newsweek.com site

понедельник, 23 января 2017 г.

Trump’s Lawyers Argue The President Is Too Important For State Court

Trump’s Lawyers Argue The President Is Too Important For State Court

NEW YORK ― As one of the president’s lawyers argues that his office grants him immunity from obstructing justice in the Russia investigation, Trump’s legal team is trying a similar tactic against one of the women who accused him of sexual harassment.


President Donald Trump’s longtime lawyer, Marc Kasowitz, stood in state Supreme Court on Tuesday, arguing that Justice Jennifer Schecter didn’t have the authority to push forward a defamation suit brought against the president by sexual harassment accuser Summer Zervos.


In other words, Trump is above the law.


Though the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Clinton v. Jones established that a sitting president could be sued for private actions occurring before they take office, Trump’s camp has argued that this case does not apply because it’s being held in state rather than federal court.


Summer Zervos is in state Supreme Court with Gloria Allred today. Arguments to decide whether her defamation suit against Trump will go forward. If it does, he could be forced to appear pic.twitter.com/DEYkgFl6av

— Andy Campbell (@AndyBCampbell) December 5, 2017

“The president is a unique officer in the Executive Branch,” Kasowitz said in court, as Zervos and her attorneys looked on.


“Are you saying that I’m not constitutionally responsible for state court cases or controversies that come before me?” Schecter asked.


“Not with regard to the president, your honor,” Kasowitz responded.


Zervos’ attorney, Mariann Wang, contended that there’s never been a court decision that state courts don’t have jurisdiction in cases like these.


Of course, Trump’s camp feels it has every reason to try and shut the case down ― not least because it has broad implications for both his presidency and others to come. If the case proceeds, some of Trump’s past could be made public by Zervos’ attorneys, and Trump could be called to testify, according to The Washington Post.


Celebrity attorney Gloria Allred, who’s also representing Zervos, wouldn’t say after the hearing whether she’d try to depose the president if the case went forward.


Zervos, who in October 2016 accused Trump of grabbing her breast and forcing kisses on her among other allegations, filed suit in January after Trump publicly called her a liar. Trump filed a motion to dismiss or delay the case ― a tactic former President Bill Clinton used before he was impeached ― and Tuesday’s hearing was set to discuss that option.


Judge Schecter said she’d make a decision at a later date. If it does go forward, the case will likely be drawn out and ugly. Kasowitz argued again on Tuesday that Zervos’ accusation was a political move, and that Trump’s tweets calling her and other accusers liars are protected speech.



Original article and pictures take s.m.huffpost.com site

среда, 28 декабря 2016 г.

Trump reported to have ordered lawyer to urge Sessions not to recuse himself

Trump reported to have ordered lawyer to urge Sessions not to recuse himself

President Donald Trump ordered his White House counsel to stop Attorney General Jeff Sessions from recusing himself in the Justice Department's investigation into potential ties between Russia and the Trump campaign, The New York Times and The Associated Press reported Thursday night.


The Times cited two sources as saying White House Counsel Don McGahn tried but failed to persuade Sessions not to recuse himself.


The AP also cited two people familiar with the discussions as confirming details of the conversation between McGahn and Sessions.




Sessions declined, and in March he stepped aside from the inquiry, which is looking into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election. Sessions took the action after it emerged that he had failed to disclose meetings with Russian officials during his Senate confirmation hearing.


NBC News has confirmed aspects of the reports.


An official directly familiar with the matter told NBC News that McGahn and other White House officials called Sessions and urged him not to recuse himself. The official said the calls came after Sessions had already made his decision to recuse, based on advice from career Justice Department professionals. The official said it wasn't just McGahn but other White House officials who made calls.


A White House lawyer for Trump, Ty Cobb, said he had no comment on the Times report Thursday night.


The Sessions recusal has been a sore spot for Trump for months, with the president publicly deriding the decision and lamenting his selection of the former Alabama senator as his attorney general.


“He should not have recused himself from the Russia investigation almost immediately after he took office, and if he was going to recuse himself, he should have told me prior to taking office, and I would have quite simply picked somebody else,” Trump said at a press conference on July 25th. “It’s not fair to the presidency.”


When Sessions announced he was recusing himself, he said he had no improper contacts with the Russians but would withdraw because of his involvement in the Trump campaign.


Sessions' deputy, Rod Rosenstein, took over the investigation. After Trump fired FBI director James Comey two months later, Rosenstein appointed former FBI Director Robert Mueller as special counsel to lead the Russia probe.


Four members of Trump's transition team or cabinet, including his former campaign chairman Paul Manafort and national security adviser Michael Flynn, have been charged so far in the investigation.


While the White House and some Republicans in Congress have sought to downplay the seriousness and credibility of the Mueller probe, Trump's former chief strategist Steve Bannon appeared to lend it new credibility with explosive comments reported in a new tell-all book about the Trump administration.


NBC News reported last month that Mueller appears to be focused on possible obstruction of justice by the president, according to two people familiar with the matter.


Original article and pictures take nodeassets.nbcnews.com site

понедельник, 21 ноября 2016 г.

Trump lawyer's backstory for a stunning tweet

Trump lawyer's backstory for a stunning tweet
Trump's lawyer John Dowd in 2011. Photo: Richard Drew / AP

John Dowd, President Trump's personal lawyer, tells me that a Trump tweet that caused an eruption yesterday was "my mistake," made in a tweet he had drafted and passed to White House social media director Dan Scavino.


  • "I'm out of the tweeting business," Dowd said with a chuckle. "I did not mean to break news."

Did President Trump admit obstruction of justice? That was the instant question online after he tweeted:


  • "I had to fire General Flynn because he lied to the Vice President and the FBI. He has pled guilty to those lies. It is a shame because his actions during the transition were lawful. There was nothing to hide!"
  • Dowd: "The tweet did not admit obstruction. That is an ignorant and arrogant assertion."

Why it matters: If Trump knew, before he fired Flynn, that the aide had lied to the FBI, that would further taint Trump's months-later firing of FBI Director James Comey. It would also make his appeals to Comey to go easy on Flynn all the more problematic.


Here's what Dowd says happened ... When acting attorney general Sally Yates (later fired by Trump) went to the White House on Jan. 26, she told White House Counsel Don McGahn that Flynn had "given the agents the same story he gave the Vice President" about his interactions with Russians.


  • Those statements were clearly incorrect — the point of her warning to the White House.
  • But Dowd says there's a crucial distinction: "For some reason, the [Justice] Department didn't want to make an accusation of lying."
  • McGahn then briefed Trump: "All the president knew was that the department was not accusing him of lying."
  • Dowd added: "The point of that tweet was entirely correct. It's just very sad. I don't know why the guy lied. He didn't need to."

Be smart: The tweet, and this explanation, are just plain suspicious and weird. Flynn was fired for lying to Pence. FBI agents said he told them the same story.


Breaking ... "Trump is attacking his own FBI in a series of tweets and says the law enforcement agency's reputation is 'in Tatters - worst in History!' The president says in a tweet that 'we will bring it back to greatness.'"


  • Trump: "Report [in apparently not-fake WP and NYT]: 'ANTI-TRUMP FBI AGENT LED CLINTON EMAIL PROBE' Now it all starts to make sense! ... Tainted (no, very dishonest?) FBI 'agent's role in Clinton probe under review.'"
  • "I never asked Comey to stop investigating Flynn. Just more Fake News covering another Comey lie!"

Article of the day, "Emails Dispute Picture of Flynn As a Rogue Actor," on N.Y. Times front page:


  • "On Dec. 29, a transition adviser to Mr. Trump, K. T. McFarland, wrote in an email to a colleague that sanctions announced hours before by the Obama administration in retaliation for Russian election meddling were aimed at discrediting Mr. Trump's victory."
  • "Trump advisers feared that a cycle of retaliation between the United States and Russia would keep the spotlight on Moscow's election meddling."
  • "As part of the outreach, Ms. McFarland wrote, [Mike] Flynn would be speaking with the Russian ambassador ... hours after Mr. Obama's sanctions were announced."

Original article and pictures take assets.axios.com site